Saturday, December 3, 2011

Post-Racial America?

With the election of Barack Obama, our first black president, Americans would like to think that we have finally shifted into a post-racial society. However, the racial controversies that Barack Obama has encountered over the course of his presidency suggest otherwise. For instance, in July of 2009, the arrest of African-American Professor Henry Louis Gates in his home by Officer James Crowley of the Cambridge Police ignited a debate as to whether the arrest was racially motivated, and President Obama’s remarks about the potential racial undertones of the arrest sparked a media controversy. Also, the Tea Party Movement, which started as a response to Obama’s proposed health care bill, was accused of racism and opposition to a black president. These are just two of several racial controversies that have occurred in the last three years. I believe that America is not yet post-racial. But at the same time, one has to ask, is it even possible for America to ever be completely post-racial? My vote is for no. Not entirely, at least.

As we discussed a few weeks ago in class, the majority of whites seem to be “order theorists,” who assert that the “Civil Rights problem” is a problem of exclusion from institutions, and now that blacks can enter any institution, the problem has been solved. However, most blacks are “conflict theorists,” who believe that, although the problem has gotten better, the problem is structural, and that there are systematic and structural barriers to equality (i.e. job discrimination). That is why blacks are more likely than whites to advocate welfare programs and other government-run programs.

Why does this disconnect exist? Bobo’s and Charles’ “Race in the American Mind: From the Moynihan Report to the Obama Candidacy” discussed this. First of all, history plays a key role. The past is something that cannot be ignored when discussing race. The struggles of blacks have been different from the “struggles” of whites in America. Secondly, since whites were the segregators and blacks were the victims of segregation, there is an obvious animosity, one that will probably never be completely eliminated. Because of these differing contexts, blacks and whites tend to have different views of how much government should be involved in their lives, and these differences prevent them from completely integrating.

Also, another barrier to a “post-racial era” is that blacks and whites tend to have different goals. Many whites want to assimilate the blacks into American culture so that race can only be a matter of skin color. But at the same time, blacks are trying to maintain a sense of identity and culture. Many whites would not identify themselves as white. They would sooner identify themselves by their sex, age, personality, etc. Blacks, however, are more likely to identify themselves as black. Blacks realize the importance of their culture and have pride in the progress that their race has made over the last few centuries. Thus, while whites want to absorb blacks, blacks want to hold on to their heritage and identity.

Because of what I stated, I feel that the “elephant” of race will always exist in politics, media, and even relationships. I feel like the best thing that America can achieve is a mutual respect and an understanding of some of the fundamental differences between the two races. If we are sensitive to each other’s backgrounds and realize and accept the different cultures, we can get past this “race problem.”

6 comments:

  1. I realize we discussed conflict theorists (such as Malcolm X) and order theorists (such as MLK) as emerging in the context of the Civil Rights Movement, but what confuses me is the fact that both beliefs are still prevalent. Isn’t it clear that merely de-segregation is not the complete solution? Jim Crow laws were abolished decades ago, yet there are still so many divides in certain opportunities for different races. The fact that African Americans are directed to African American neighborhoods, and that white Americans are guided to white neighborhoods is just one example we have discussed. Apart from housing segregation, the country still displays undeniable racial discrimination in the labor and political realms. These findings are undesirable, but undeniable.
    So how is it that people still take the stand of an order theorist? It is hard for me to determine. There are none, or very few, laws specifically addressing race. There is no longer legal segregation, but segregation clearly persists. It is still possible to blame segregation, but after the legal de-segregation of the country, there is no other source but our institutions. Does anyone else feel that this is obvious? Can we claim that the conflict theorists are right?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I feel like many order theorists are at the point in which they feel like if African Americans are still poor and unemployed, that is it their own fault. In "Race in the American Mind," Bobo and Charles said "On one side of the perceptual divide are whites, who are increasingly less inclined to believe that blacks and other minorities face structural barriers to upward mobility. Rather, if blacks cannot get ahead, whites increasingly blame blacks themselves for a lack of effort, motivation or will" (247). Order theorists would probably argue that, after all this time, race no longer correlates with an inability to prosper (or at least it shouldn't). And also, it is important to realize that order theorists have selfish reasoning too. If the conflict theorists "win," then more expensive welfare programs would probably be instated. This takes money out of their pockets.
    However, racial discrimination in the workplace, banks, and housing is undeniable. Racial stereotypes, especially about crime and perverseness, still exist, especially about black males. And even if people don’t intend to be racist, they can’t help but notice color when making judgments about others. I think that both theories have fair points, but the claims of order theorists that the racist “problem” has been solved is simply not accurate.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think you make several very good points in this blog post. I feel like playing the race card is an easy escape for blacks who are being ridiculed by white people. It is extremely overplayed and it seems impossible to combat the race card. But on that note, racial prejudice still does exist throughout the United States. However, I feel like racism has now changed the tables and several blacks are taking advantage of this word. Its easier to blame a larger picture for something than it is to blame oneself for not accomplishing something. If a black person didn't get a job, it is much easier to blame it on racism than on the fact that they aren't qualified. There is now reverse racism in the United States too, especially within colleges. I understand that black people are proud of their heritage and for good reason too. But I like how you pointed out this fact of making it hard to integrate them into "white" culture. I feel like there will always be this conflict between whites attempting to integrate blacks and blur the racial barrier yet blacks holding onto their own culture. I do not know if there will ever be a good solution to this. Condoleezza Rice also attempts to touch on this topic in that video but she too is at a loss of what can be done. I think she nailed it when she said that racism is like a birthmark in American History. We will never be able to fully get rid of it no mater how much we cover it up.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Self identification is a very tricky subject. Overall, I think people try to identify themselves as one thing or another way too quickly, me included. I suppose this makes people feel that they are part of a larger group and creates a common ground when there is not one. We are quick to select a political party. We are quick to associate ourselves with members of our own race. But while I think people tend to do this too fast, identifying you by things other than race can help relations with other people. For example, during the Saints run to the Super Bowl in 2010, if you asked any New Olreanean during that year how they would define themselves, I am relatively certain a majority would first identify themselves as a Saints fan. There was no black and white during these months and the subsequent months after. We were all just Saints fans. This easy way to identify ourselves connected an entire city. My overall message here would be that we are constantly changing what defines us. It truly depends on the present situation in which you are and to what kind of circumstances you are exposed.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think that opinions on whether we are in a post-racial America depends on who you ask. Significant strides can be seen in integrated neighborhoods, inter racial marriage, people in a minority obtaining high positions in companies, etc. We talked in class about the difference between the segregated and the segregators. If you were to ask the segregators, they would tell you that we have entered a post-racial America; however, the segregated can still see changes that need to be made.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I agree with the points made within your post, our society still finds itself attempting to find a stand within the issue of race. Depending on generation of responders or where they are from, a person can receive answers that vary quite a bit. I am not sure whether or not as a society we can ever become post-racial. I think in order for America to actually move past this issue, we must actually face the wrong that our previous generations have done. I think that is the hardest part, especially for Southerners. While they admit that slavery was bad, you still have individuals that pass down racial judgments through their family and I am not sure if you can ever stop that. Our society has become divided in many aspects, whether African-Americans still feel discriminated against or whites feel as if there is a form a reverse racism occurring within our society. Americans need to find a way to connect and identify themselves as a whole, in order for a post racial society to exist.

    ReplyDelete